NRDC: White House Interferes with EPA Scientists' Analysis of Toxic Chemicals
By admin - Posted on June 16th, 2008
Poses Risk to Public Health
WASHINGTON -- June 12, 2008 – A new White House policy deals a crippling blow to the ability of the scientific staff of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to identify chemicals that pose the greatest risk to public health, potentially putting millions of people at risk, according to public health experts at the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC).
At issue is the interference with EPA’s Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) program. The new White House policy will delay scientific assessments of chemicals’ health risks and hinder opportunities for public comment and scientific debate. IRIS evaluates the risks of hundreds of toxic chemicals and their potential impacts on human health. While not a regulatory program, IRIS assessments are relied upon by EPA program offices and states (as well as territorial, tribal and international governments) for setting standards for drinking water, air pollution and toxic waste cleanups.
Dr. Linda Greer, Ph.D., director of NRDC’s public health program, will testify today before the House Science Committee’s Investigations and Oversight Subcommittee on the Bush administration’s recent actions to politicize and inject secrecy into EPA’s process for identifying the health risks posed by toxic chemicals.
The following is a statement from Dr. Greer, concerning EPA’s IRIS program and the potential impacts if the Administration’s actions are not reversed by Congress:
“These changes are yet another escalation of the administration’s war on science and public health that has gone on for nearly eight years. The recent changes to the IRIS process are part of a much broader agenda to sacrifice public health protections and limit public understanding of the risk of toxic chemicals to benefit polluting industries and federal agencies. By attempting to weaken the IRIS process, the administration has zeroed in on one of the earliest and most fundamental steps in protecting public health, in which EPA’s scientists identify the health risks posed by exposure to certain chemicals.”
Dr. Greer’s full testimony can be found at: http://docs.nrdc.org/health/
Source: NRDC
Bookmark/Search this post with:
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
Login to post comments
Related articles
- Groups Challenge EPA Regulation that Allows Pesticide Testing on Humans
- House Oversight Committee Chairman Waxman Statement on EPA’s Final Rule on Lead Renovation, Repair, and Painting
- New Jersey Coalition Calls For Investigation Of Private Wells To Protect Families From PFOA In Drinking Water
- Lawsuit Seeks to Strengthen Weak Clean Air Plan for Southern California
- EPA Ignores Own Experts, Opts for More Ozone Pollution
Latest stories
- Barack Obama Statement on Russia's Decision to Recognize Abkhazia and South Ossetia as Independent States
- Statement from Senator Barack Obama on the Census Income, Health Insurance and Poverty Numbers
- John McCain Campaign Announces Tennessee Grassroots Leadership
- NASA Renames Observatory For Fermi, Reveals Entire Gamma-Ray Sky
- NASA's Mars Rover Opportunity Climbing Out of Victoria Crater
- NASA's Space Shuttle Atlantis To Move To Launch Pad Saturday
- NASA and ATK Investigate Failed Launch Of Hypersonic Experiments
- White House Press Briefing by Tony Fratto - August 26, 2008
- National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month, 2008
- George Bush Condemns Actions Taken by Russian President in Regards to Georgia
Yes We Can
Yes We Can:
