Conyers: Attorney General Mukasey Must Answer Congress about New Hampshire Phone Jamming
December 20, 2007 -- (Washington, DC) - Today, House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, Jr. (D-MI) demanded answers from the Justice Department about allegations that department officials delayed a key indictment in the New Hampshire Phone Jamming case to minimize the political impact of the scandal on the 2004 election.
Questions about that issue were raised in a letter that Conyers and other Judiciary Committee members sent on October 3 to Acting Attorney General Keisler, and press reports yesterday include statements by a knowledgable official confirming the allegations. Today's letter to Attorney General Michael Mukasey demands answers to the questions posed in the first letter and seeks relevant documents and access to department officials with knowledge of the events.
Committee letter to AG Mukasey
Source: House Judiciary Committee
Related articles
- Conyers, Nadler Request Torture Memos
- House Judiciary Chairman Conyers Reacts to DOJ Voting Chief's Comments on 2004 Ohio Investigation
- Judiciary Members Seek Answers on "Phone Jamming," Voter Suppression Cases
- Conyers: Scott McClellan Revelations Troubling, Require Further Scrutiny
- Conyers Subpoenas Karl Rove
Latest stories
- Colin Powell Endorses Barack Obama for President: Video from this morning's appearance on Meet the Press
- Keating Economics
- Pelosi: The Legislation Has Failed But the Crisis Has Not Gone Away; We Must Work in a Bipartisan Way to Pass New Legislation
- Congressman Hoyer Statement Following Vote on Emergency Economic Stabilization Act
- Senator McCaskill Calls for Greater Accountability on Wall Street
- Senator Bob Casey Statement on Bailout Bill
- Senator Hillary Clinton Calls for Bipartisan Action on Economic Crisis
- Congress Passes Obama, Murkowski, Allen Bill to Ban Dangerous Mercury Exports
- Barack Obama Statement on Financial Plan Breakthrough
- Barack Obama Calls on VA Secretary to Provide Critical Data on Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans to Improve Veterans Services
Yes We Can
Yes We Can:

















