Connecticut Attorney General's Statements On Foxwoods Objection To Union Election
By admin - Posted on December 6th, 2007
December 4, 2007 -- "These contentions by Foxwoods seem flawed and futile. Their main legal complaint disputing application of federal labor laws has already been soundly and repeatedly rejected by the NLRB and the courts. Their grab bag collection of grievances seems contrived and unsupported. The overwhelming vote in favor of union representation fatally undercuts complaints about technical issues, even if true. We will review these objections and respond in depth as the proceeding goes forward.
"Broad claims of impropriety are easily made - but no specific facts or evidence have been provided to support them."
Source: Connecticut Attorney General
Scroll down for related articles:
Related articles
- 2007-12-06: Connecticut Attorney General's Statements On Foxwoods Objection To Union Election
- 2007-11-22: Connecticut AG Applauds NLRB Denial Of Stay For Foxwoods Union Election, Rejection Of Appeal
- 2007-11-20: Connecticut Attorney General Blasts Foxwoods For Seeking Delay Of Union Vote
- 2007-11-20: Connecticut AG Files Brief Opposing Foxwoods Appeal Of NLRB Ruling Ordering Dealer Unionization Vote
- 2007-10-26: Connecticut Attorney General Hails NLRB Approval Of Union Election For Foxwoods Dealers
- 2007-10-03: Connecticut Attorney General Says Petition To Unionize Foxwoods Dealers Is Historic Vital Victory
- 2009-02-27: U.S. Department Of Labor Announces Grant Exceeding $880,000 To Assist Gaming Industry Workers In Connecticut Affected By Layoffs
- 2007-10-23: Connecticut Attorney General Files Brief Supporting UAW Petition For Foxwoods Unionization Vote
- 2009-04-22: CT Governor Rell: Far-Reaching Labor Agreement Will Cut Costs for Taxpayers Now and in Future
- 2007-10-26: NLRB Rules for Election at Foxwoods for Casino Dealers
- 2007-10-23: Elected Officials Stand with Foxwoods Casino Dealers
- 2007-10-15: Connecticut Attorney General Files Motion To Intervene In NLRB Hearing On Foxwoods Unionization Vote
